The Daily Spin – DraftKings Daily Fantasy Golf Preview – CareerBuilder Challenge

Zachary Turcotte
By Zachary Turcotte January 17, 2018 06:33

I love the way that the NFL and golf seasons compliment each other so well. Just as one starts to rev up, the other begins to wind down. These first few weeks of the PGA season each new calendar year feel a lot like the NFL preseason for me in terms of my approach. I’m watching and taking notes, but not jumping in a whole lot as the players ease themselves back onto a regular schedule. The Hawaii events are fun and the Sony Open generally attracts a similar field from year to year with a course that lines up with enough other comparable courses so that I feel good about my cash games there each season, but we do get an interesting mix of winners which can make GPP play a little more challenging.

This week, the tour heads back to the continental US for the CareerBuilder Challenge which takes place in La Quinta and Palm Desert, California. At the beginning of each year, we get a few little curveballs thrown at us which can throw off new players if you are not prepared. The CareerBuilder has a couple of interesting quirks that are notable and need to be discussed right out front. First off, there are three different courses in play this week and the cut does not take place until AFTER the third round. The first thing you should think about here is that this makes the weekend golf contests much more intense and totally different in terms of the type of strategy you want to use for those events. Typically, we are monitoring for an MDF which can shake things up, but in this case, the whole field will be in play on Saturday. The cut rules are the same with T70 or better getting to play on Sunday, but there is also one other caveat where if MORE THAN 78 players  do get through, then the cut drops down to the top 60 players left in the field, an instant MDF of sorts where those others will be credited with making the cut and get a check, but will not tee it up on Sunday.

The next consideration this week is that this is a Pro-Am event. Now, most weeks, there is a one round Pro-Am event before the actual tournament, but this event and Pebble Beach in February take things up a notch and carry out the Pro-Am DURING the first three rounds of the actual golf tournament. Obviously, the PGA does not want the amateurs to come off looking too foolish over the three rounds that they are out there which means in turn that the courses and the setups are going to be purposefully easier than what we will see on other courses throughout the season, thus leading to some of the lowest scores that we are going to see all year. Weather was an issue last year the first couple of rounds and yet it was still easy enough for Adam Hadwin to fire a 59 on his way to a 2nd place finish behind eventual winner, Hudson Swafford, who then saw his streak of 19 cuts made in a row snapped the following week as I followed him during the second round of the Farmers Insurance Open at Torrey Pines.

This is another one of those events where I try to tread a bit lightly as I consider it to be the last week of what I would term the preseason for golf each year. With three courses in play, a Pro-Am and the scores being out of control to the low side, it opens up the potential list of winners much wider than usual. The three round cut rule also throws off our normal strategy to some degree. With the ability to score a lot over the first three rounds, you do not need to be thinking about the cut quite as much as normal for cash game purposes. Obviously, you’ll still more than likely need a clean 6/6 for GPP events of any size in order to win. We can certainly still remain profitable this week, but with the key difference and the weaker field, I would just as soon save my bigger buy-ins for next weekend.

Following this week, we will get a nice strong field at Torrey Pines and the following week is the Waste Management Open, both of which are great events with fun courses and plenty of star power. In February, we’ll also hit Pebble Beach and Riviera so there are some great events ahead once we get past this final tuneup. As a reminder, I will be out at Torrey Pines next weekend for the Farmers Insurance Open and will be joined by Erik ‘Statboy’ Dantoft as well as our website developer, Aaron ‘Juice’ Johnson. If you are planning to be in the area, please let us know so we can grab a drink and follow a group or two around the course, preferably not our core guys as I usually bring the black magic with me even on the road.

I want to provide a quick recap for last week as it proved to be a pretty easy week for me in cash games and reasonable, but not great results in GPP events. The core players that I built around in cash games all fared well. If you simply took the lineup I laid out for you of ZJ, Webb, CHIII and Woodland at the top with Dufner and Stanley anchoring at the low end, you would have cruised to an easy win. I want to talk a little bit about the process of building cash games as I received an email today from a subscriber who asked me to look over a couple of lineups and give him my honest analysis of what happened with the two lineups that he put into play last week. Here are the two lineups that he sent me to look at from last week:

Dufner
Hossler
Howell
Leishman
Reavie
Woodland

Dufner
Cook
Howell
Henley
Reavie
Smith

Look both of them over and see if you can spot whether or not any mistakes were made or if this particular owner simply got unlucky. In my opinion, one lineup qualifies as a solid cash lineup that just had some bad luck while the other lineup made one fatal flaw that is worth examining in some detail. Here is what I wrote in reply:

I see the problem right away in your first cash game lineup….Beau Hossler can’t be a part of your cash game rotation right now. He’s purely a GPP play and just not consistent enough to be on a cash game team. The big problem there is that he’s hit and miss and that nobody else will be on him in cash so when he misses like that, you’re dead since you’re one of the only people that own him.

The other team, you just got a little unlucky. It took Henley literally missing a two foot putt and then a 4 foot putt on a hole for him to miss the cut on the number. That second cash team was well constructed and well reasoned. You played that one correctly and just got unlucky.

You really have to focus on not getting fancy in cash games. I try to give a list of players in my column each week that are cash specific and think that 15/18 made it to the weekend last week (Henley was a miss for me as well). I think the key is in not trying to do too much at the top end of the salary tiers. A lot of times we fall in love with getting three or four players in near the top end and then try to squeeze in the last player or two on the end at the lower end of the spectrum and we play this little game in our heads thinking ‘well….for $6,700 he’s got a shot…’ and then click submit. I’d rather see you build a little more from the bottom up. Find the guys at the low end who you are most comfortable with and then work up to see who you can squeeze in at the top, rather than doing it the opposite way and trying to squeeze guys in at the bottom. I’d rather have you get to the end of your cash lineup build and be arguing between Webb Simpson and Cam Smith instead of being down near the bottom and trying to talk yourself into Aaron Wise or Beau Hossler.

I thought this was a great question and a good spot to do just a little bit of teaching as these types of details often get overlooked, but if not discussed or analyzed, they can built up week after week and instead of being able to win enough to be profitable over time, you start to find yourself grinding out a small loss that compounds over time. The lesson here is to work on establishing the bottom end of acceptable cash game players first and then work up. Last week, I used Dufner, Stanley and Cink as my low end cash game players that I felt 100% comfortable using. Once I had that in place, I worked around them to fit in my favorites at the top. In GPP contests, this is not an issue and you actually will want to take some shots in the lower range at lower ownership levels, but in cash games, there is no reward for the risk.

I am not going to cover all three of the courses again here this week as it is tedious to do so when Adam Daly did such a fine job of it himself earlier in the week right here. Just realize that the Stadium Course is the toughest of the three and is played twice by all players, once in the first three rounds and by everyone on Sunday. The weather does not look like it will play a factor this week and the tee times should not be an issue either as everyone will be bunched together with all three courses going at once. I do not currently see an advantage in chasing a particular course rotation over the other two. What I would recommend is using a portion of your GPP teams to be built around specific course rotations. If by chance one rotation was more favorable than the other two, you’ll be in the rare spot of having a team or two that benefits from this. Very, very few owners will make this move this week. As always, do not go outside of your normal player pool simply to accommodate course selection. Build your player pool and then stack them based upon the players you ALREADY like.

Key stats for the week:
Birdie or Better %: 25%
Strokes Gained Putting: 20%
Strokes Gained Tee to Green: 20%
Par 5 Scoring: 10%
Scrambling Prox: 10%
Proximity: 10%
Proximity 150-175 yards: 5%

Sign up for an FGI account today to see the rest of this post.

 

 

Zachary Turcotte
By Zachary Turcotte January 17, 2018 06:33

Log In

Having trouble logging in?
Try logging in here